next up previous
Next: About this document Up: Stabilization of Weakly Previous: Comparison with the ESTEC

Appendix - Frequency of Whirl Due to Structural and Viscous Rotating Damping

Consider the rotor of Fig. 1. The relative motion of the two masses is described (in the inertial reference frame) by the equation:

displaymath1239

where z is the position vector in the complex plane, tex2html_wrap_inline1243 is the reduced mass of the system, tex2html_wrap_inline1191 is the coefficient of rotating damping and there is no non-rotating damping (see §6). The characteristic equation associated to the equation of motion of the system is:

displaymath1247

The solution of Eq. (A2) is of the type tex2html_wrap_inline1251 , so that the real part of tex2html_wrap_inline1253 , tex2html_wrap_inline1255 , is the angular frequency of the whirling motion when the imaginary part of tex2html_wrap_inline1253 is negative. Therefore the destabilizing forward whirling motion has frequency:

displaymath1259

Let us compute tex2html_wrap_inline1255 for a system dominated by structural damping and for a system dominated by viscous damping.

displaymath1265

hence:

displaymath1267

and, if tex2html_wrap_inline713 :

displaymath1271

Since rotating damping derives from dissipation at frequency tex2html_wrap_inline1155 , the corresponding Q is certainly such that tex2html_wrap_inline685 , yielding:

displaymath1279

displaymath1283

with tex2html_wrap_inline721 the quality factor of the system due to rotating friction of viscous nature. Then:

displaymath1287

Since tex2html_wrap_inline713 and tex2html_wrap_inline1291 , the quantity tex2html_wrap_inline1293 is dominant with respect to tex2html_wrap_inline1295 and we have:

displaymath1297

It follows that the whirling frequency is:

displaymath1299

The case of very large viscous damping can certainly be ruled out in GG (and probably also in ground rotating machines with tex2html_wrap_inline1301 ). This means that in GG the coefficient of viscous rotating damping (A8) can never be used with a value of tex2html_wrap_inline721 such that tex2html_wrap_inline729 . We shall have tex2html_wrap_inline1309 ( tex2html_wrap_inline1311 ) with tex2html_wrap_inline1313 in the case of small viscous friction, and tex2html_wrap_inline1315 in the intermediate case. Hence, tex2html_wrap_inline1317 where Q is the quality factor due to structural damping. This means tex2html_wrap_inline1321 in the case of small viscous friction and tex2html_wrap_inline1323 in the intermediate case. The force required to stabilize the whirling motion is in all cases smaller than the elastic force of the spring (Eqs. (37), (39)). In GG, rotating friction comes from dissipation, in vacuum and at the spin frequency, in the tiny suspension springs and in the small rotating electrostatic plates which provide stabilizing forces much smaller than the spring forces themselves (see §4). Therefore, rotating structural friction is bound to be very small and rotating viscous friction (e.g. due to imperfect clamping of the suspensions) very small, if any. Ground tests based on the measurement of tex2html_wrap_inline585 , tex2html_wrap_inline709 and tex2html_wrap_inline587 will be performed to determine the nature of rotating damping in the system using the results (A7) and (A11).


next up previous
Next: About this document Up: Stabilization of Weakly Previous: Comparison with the ESTEC


Research Papers Available Online

       (Anna Nobili- nobili@dm.unipi.it)

)